Birthright citizenship not covered by US constitution, ‘will be ended one way or the other’ – Trump.
Birth-Right Babies or Moorish Americans huh. Well the only Illegal Aliens here are from various Modern European Countries. Evey one of those Americans Marching towards the (fake Borders) are Ab-Original American Sisters and Brothers, coming to see their waking Kin-Folk. The Moors are Back in Town, this time in “Love LUV” Truth Peace Freedom Justice Mercy and Right”.
Published time: 31 Oct, 2018 13:30 Edited time: 31 Oct, 2018 14:27 Get short URL
© Reuters / Hannah McKay
President Donald Trump said that the US Constitution does not guarantee the right to citizenship to everyone born in the country and doubled down on his promise to end the practice.
Trump wrote in a Twitter post:
So-called Birthright Citizenship, which costs our Country billions of dollars and is very unfair to our citizens, will be ended one way or the other. It is not covered by the 14th Amendment because of the words ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof.’ Many legal scholars agree…..
In a follow-up tweet, Trump referenced former Democratic Senator Harry Reid’s 1993 calim that “no sane country” would award birthright citizenship to the children of illegal immigrants, and vowed that the issue will be “settled by the United States Supreme Court.”
….Harry Reid was right in 1993, before he and the Democrats went insane and started with the Open Borders (which brings massive Crime) “stuff.” Don’t forget the nasty term Anchor Babies. I will keep our Country safe. This case will be settled by the United States Supreme Court!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 31, 2018
Trump’s tweets build on comments the president made in an interview with Axios, taped on Monday. Trump told Axios that he plans to end birthright citizenship “with an executive order,” and called the policy “ridiculous.”
Trump’s words triggered a Constitutional uproar. In the US, birthright citizenship is guaranteed by the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which reads: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” While originally drafted in 1868 to establish civil rights for freed slaves and their descendents, the amendment has been widely interpreted to grant full citizenship rights to anyone born within the US.
As such, any executive order would be bound by the Constitution. However, since the 14th Amendment’s inception, legal scholars have wrangled over the line “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” Read more
‘5,239 is not the top line’: Pentagon promises to send even more troops to seal Mexico border
Some have argued that illegal immigrants are not subject to the US’ jurisdiction as they owe their loyalty to a foreign country, while others have argued that by entering the US, these immigrants make themselves subject to US law. Congress could legislate to clarify this ambiguity, a move hinted at by South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham on Tuesday.
Vice President Mike Pence also suggested that the line “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” gives Trump wiggle room to issue an executive order.
“The Supreme Court of the United States has never ruled on whether or not the language of the 14th Amendment ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof’ applies specifically to people who are in the country illegally,” Pence said at a Politico event on Tuesday.
House Speaker Paul Ryan, on the other hand, sided with the opposing school of thought. “You cannot end birthright citizenship with an executive order,” Ryan told WVLK Radio on Tuesday. “You obviously cannot do that.”
If Trump issues an executive order, its constitutionality will likely be decided by the federal courts, as was the case earlier this year and last year when the first iterations of the president’s controversial travel ban were declared unconstitutional.
For now, the legal debate is confined to Twitter. There, Trump’s supporters and opponents have been bickering over the precise meaning of the 14th Amendment.
The 14th Amendment was to protect and include those brought here against their will as slaves. Not for illegal migrants to exploit our public assistance. Come in legally. Respect our laws. Supreme Court will ultimately decide this. https://t.co/pniHn477Xy— America First Heidi (@heidimdorsey) October 31, 2018
We mustn’t get distracted. The 14th Amendment will not be nullified by executive order. We fought a Civil War to guarantee the citizenship of those born on American soil. We will not go backward now! Stand with me! 🇺🇸— David Holden (@holden2018) October 31, 2018
Everyone shut up about what the 14th Amendment was “INTENDED” to do we have a SCOTUS that will read it the way it was written. Keep that in mind.— Michael Moates (@freedom_moates) October 31, 2018
The 14th Amendment “guarantees citizenship to all persons born in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction.”
By law, children born to illegals are citizens of their parent’s country and therefore not subject to the “jurisdiction of the US.”
This isn’t even hard.— Bill Mitchell (@mitchellvii) October 30, 2018
Trump’s recent assault on birthright citizenship comes as the president looks to keep immigration in the spotlight ahead of next week’s crucial midterm elections. With immigration a top priority among Republican voters, Trump has also deployed over 5,000 troops to the US’ southern border, as multiple ‘caravans’ of Central American migrants make their way towards the US through Mexico.
Trump has called the caravans an “invasion” of “very bad thugs and gang members,” and directly asked the marching migrants to “turn around” and apply for citizenship legally.
